Particularize Out Of Books Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
| Title | : | Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam |
| Author | : | Michel Onfray |
| Book Format | : | Hardcover |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 240 pages |
| Published | : | January 10th 2007 by Arcade Publishing (first published January 26th 2005) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Religion. Nonfiction. Atheism |
Michel Onfray
Hardcover | Pages: 240 pages Rating: 3.78 | 3325 Users | 198 Reviews
Interpretation To Books Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
This tightly argued, hugely controversial work convincingly demonstrates how the world's three major monotheistic religions-Christianity, Judaism, and Islam-have attempted to suppress knowledge, science, pleasure, and desire, often condemning nonbelievers to death. If Nietzsche proclaimed the "Death of God," Onfray starts from the premise that not only is God still very much alive, but increasingly controlled by fundamentalists who pose a danger to the human race. Documenting the ravages from religious intolerance over the centuries, the author makes a strong case against the three religions for demanding faith, belief, obedience and submission, and for extolling the "next life" at the expense of the here and now. Not since Nietzsche has a work so groundbreaking and explosive appeared to question the role of the world's dominant religions.
Define Books As Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
| Original Title: | Traite d' athéologie: Physique de la métaphysique |
| ISBN: | 1559708204 (ISBN13: 9781559708203) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Out Of Books Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
Ratings: 3.78 From 3325 Users | 198 ReviewsEvaluation Out Of Books Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
Atheist Manifesto is more than a bit disappointing although the subtitle The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam accurately describes the book. What author Onfray is against and why is abundantly clear. What he advocates and why are much less so, or at least the arguments are unexamined.Onfrays case against rests on several grounds: (a) belief in God is irrational and not grounded in reality; (b) the three great monotheistic religions are focused on the hereafter to the detriment ofIts all rather simple, really: there are no gods.Trying to get this simple message across, however, has not always been simple. In general, people have become so used to having the familiar figures of their gods so imbedded and integrated into their lives that emotionally they cannot seem to shake themselves out of their stupors: they feel a loss of identity, of culture, of difference, of rituals, of all those things that they have been taught are the essentials to their various faiths. They
Michel Onfray must be a reason that American Christians do not like the French. Take Sam Harris and George Smith (both atheist writers) and add a bit of French snobbery and you've got Onfray. This book is not altogether thorough, but presents its material, if not completely fairly, at least fairly credibly. It is not too long (245 pgs), but combs through quite a bit of material. It is a great introduction to many atheistic theories and viewpoints concerning religious belief. Onfray divides his
Great book overall with excellent, solid points to support not only atheism but the idea of religion (in particular, the three main monotheistic religions) as being oppressive on numerous levels. The book includes historical and textual evidence to support the claims and hypotheses made and is not an account built on personal opinion alone. As a theist, I made a promise to myself to leave all bias aside when reading this book and attempt not to take things personally. Onfray's language can get a
I found the Atheist Manifesto tiresomely repetitive and probably mean and nasty. As an atheist I have to say I'm glad this books out there and I especially found the section on Paul interesting and worthwhile, BUT on a whole it lacks finesse and versatility in the argumentation.
God is not really dead, as unfortunate as it sounds. We are just so imbibed with its episteme' that all attemps so far to disengage from forms of thoughts relinquishing traditional religion has practically gone little far. Our health needs a much freer and more radical mental struggle to clear out our culture from the insidious treat of submissive systems of ideas.Michel Onfray hereby propose his own passionate and argumentative call to duty for atheism. Pure atheism, not a faithful or disguised
The translation from the French makes for reading that is a little labored at times, but worth the effort. In terms of the recent flood of atheist manifestos, this one stands out as being particularly critical of the three monotheistic religions. A no-holds-barred, scathing criticism on monotheism. One of the things I learned was how the Church influenced who and who was not 'remembered' as part of the Enlightenment. Only the critics that were gentler seem to have made in into the mainstream of
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.